Red Sox

McAdam: Sox slump from both sides of the coin

536979.jpg

McAdam: Sox slump from both sides of the coin

By Sean McAdam
CSNNE.com Red Sox Insider Follow @sean_mcadam
A's recently as 10 days ago, the biggest question surrounding the Red Sox revolved around who should start Game 3 of the Division Series.

Now, in the aftermath of their disastrous 1-6 road trip, the focus has shifted: Will the Red Sox reach the Division Series?

In the last week, they've morphed from playoff locks to post-season suspects, their Wild Card lead trimmed to just three games in the loss column.

"Now we've put the pressure on them," said Tampa starter James Shields Sunday after limiting the Sox to a single run over 8 13 innings. "Now they have to win games. That's it. They could have swept us here and cruised on to the end and now they're not."

So, can the Red Sox hold on? Two opposing views:

YES, THEY CAN
1) True, the Sox have put themselves in this predicament. But it's the result of a bad 10 days, not a longer statistical sample.

Losing streaks are inevitable over a 162-game season. No one knows this better than the Sox, who stumbled out of the gate at 2-10 only to right themselves and play .700 ball for the next two months.

There's plenty of time left for the Red Sox to pull out of their nosedive, get healthy and get their pitching lined up for the playoffs.

2) The schedule is in their favor. Of the 16 games remaining, almost half (seven) are against Baltimore, owners of the worst record in the American League.

Beating the Orioles five times in seven tries -- surely not much of a feat -- would get the Sox to 90 wins and force the Rays to go 10-7 in their final 17 games to finish ahead -- and that's assuming the Sox lose every other game remaining.

Remember, too, that the Rays have 11 games remaining with both the Sox (four) and Yankees (seven). That's a tall order for a pitching staff and a team looking to play catch-up.

3) Reinforcements are on the way.

Having been stung by injuries the last month, the Sox are getting healthier.

Kevin Youkilis could return to the lineup Tuesday night. Josh Beckett could start as soon as Thursday, just in time for the first game of the four-game set with the Rays. Erik Bedard could pitch by the weekend.

When a team gets its cleanup hitter and 40 percent of its rotation back, that has to be a positive.

NO, THEY CAN'T
1) The biggest issue during the recent losing streak has been starting pitching. Only twice in the last 11 games have the Red Sox had a starting pitcher go longer than five innings. Not coincidentally, they are 2-9 in those 11 games.

And even with Monday's off-day, the next two scheduled starters for the Sox are Tim Wakefield, who hasn't won since the last week of July, and John Lackey, who has the worst ERA of any qualifying starter in either league.

2) Momentum is a hard thing to break late in the season.

The Sox haven't played well for nearly two weeks. There's been sloppy play -- Carl Crawford threw to the wrong base twice over the weekend -- and a general lethargy to their play.

While the bullpen has given away games late -- blowing a two-run lead with six outs to go last Wednesday; allowing a walk-off win in extra innings Saturday night -- the lineup hasn't been able to overcome early deficits.

3) This isn't an isolated slump -- almost everybody has been impacted.

In addition to the poor work by the starters, the offense has sputtered. In their six losses, the Red Sox scored 22 runs, or an average of about 3.7 per game. Take away an 11-10 slugfest loss to Toronto, however, and the average dips to just over two runs scored per loss.

Toss on some bullpen issues -- the continuing search for a trustworthy option for the seventh inning; two straight losses from Daniel Bard -- and the problems are many and unlikely to all be rectified at once.

Sean McAdam can be reached at smcadam@comcastsportsnet.com. Follow Sean on Twitter at http:twitter.comsean_mcadam

Report: Ex-Red Sox reliever Reed gets deal with Twins

red_sox_addison_reed_080317.jpg

Report: Ex-Red Sox reliever Reed gets deal with Twins

He was dubbed "Closer B" by Red Sox manager John Farrell when acquired at the trade deadline last summer, now Addison Reed is "Closer B Gone"...to the Twins.

The right-handed reliever, 29, has agreed to a two-year, $16.75 million free-agent deal with Minnesota, pending a physical, Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports and TheAthletic.com reports. 

Reed began last season with the Mets and had 19 saves and a 2.57 ERA before being traded to the Red Sox, where he had a 3.33 ERA in 29 games (27 innings) without a save as a setup man for Craig Kimbrell.  
 

Red Sox, Mookie Betts far apart on salary and heading toward arbitration

red-sox-mookie-betts.jpg

Red Sox, Mookie Betts far apart on salary and heading toward arbitration

The Red Sox and star right fielder Mookie Betts intend to go to an arbitration hearing in February, and there were signs this was coming even a year ago.

Betts was the only arbitration-eligible player on the Red Sox who did not settle on a contract with the team on Friday, when a deadline arrived for all teams and arbitration-eligible players to exchange 2018 salary figures. Jackie Bradley Jr., Xander Bogaerts and Drew Pomeranz were the biggest names to avoid hearings.

Betts filed for a $10.5 million salary and the Red Sox filed at $7.5 million.  Betts and the Red Sox agreed previously that if no figure could be settled on by the Friday deadline, they would proceed to a hearing, assistant general manager Brian O'Halloran said. 

A three-person panel of arbitrators therefore is set to determine what Betts makes in 2018: either the $7.5 million figure the Sox filed or the $10.5 million figure Betts' camp submitted. The arbitrators won't settle on a midpoint for the parties. 

O'Halloran noted to the Globe there are no hard feelings involved.

Nonetheless, such a large gap would seem to provide incentive to settle. The parties technically could still decide to do so, but that would take a change of course from the present plan. The idea was to settle any time before Friday, and they did not. 

Betts is asking for near-record money for a first-year arbitration eligible player. Kris Bryant set the record Friday with a $10.85 million settlement.

The hearings can be difficult for player-team relations because teams have to make the case in front of the player that he is worth less money than he wants.

Betts, 25, hit .264, with 24 homers, 102 RBI, 25 stolen bases and a .803 OPS in 2017, numbers that fell from his American League MVP runner-up performance in 2016, but were nonetheless very strong and coupled with first-rate defense.

This offseason is Betts' first of arbitration eligibility. In the first three years of service time in a players' career, there's no recourse if you don't like the salary a team is offering. Teams can pay players anything at league minimum or above. 

The only option a player has in those first three years is to make a stand on principle: you can force the team to technically "renew" your salary, which notes to everyone that you did not agree to the salary. Betts and his agents did that in 2017 when the Sox paid him $950,000, a very high amount relative to most contract renewals.

Some of the standard thinking behind forcing a team to renew a contract is that if an arbitration case comes up down the road — and one now looms for Betts — it's supposed to show the arbitrators that the player felt even in seasons past, he was underpaid.

Still, the Sox may have effectively combatted that perception by paying Betts almost $1 million on a renewal. Per USA Today, that $950,000 agreement in 2017 was "the second-highest one-year deal ever for a non-arbitration-eligible player with two-plus years of big league service." Mike Trout got $1 million in 2014.