Bears

Where the Bears' coaching search stands after one week and six interviews

1-7joshmcdaniels.jpg
USA Today

Where the Bears' coaching search stands after one week and six interviews

The Bears interviewed Kansas City Chiefs offensive coordinator Matt Nagy on Sunday, the team’s sixth interview since firing John Fox on New Year’s Day. Based on what general manager Ryan Pace said at the outset of the Bears' coaching search, it may wind up being limited to these six candidates.

"We've got it scaled down to some extent to be a little bit more targeted and aggressive," Pace said on New Year's Day.

Here’s where each candidate stands as Wild Card weekend comes to a close:

Vic Fangio (interviewed Jan. 3)

The Bears’ first interview went to Fangio, which was a well-earned nod to the work the team’s defensive coordinator put in over the last three years. While Fangio is a longshot for the job, his players would love to see him stick around in some capacity. 

Philadelphia Eagles quarterbacks coach John DeFilippo reportedly would be willing to keep Fangio on as defensive coordinator, according to Fox Sports’ Peter Schrader:

But Fangio isn’t a lock to remain on the Bears’ coaching staff. Fangio will become a coaching free agent this week, and the Green Bay Packers reportedly want to talk to him about replacing Dom Capers as their defensive coordinator. We’ll see how quickly things move with Fangio, but it does appear that he’ll have some options as to where he goes. 

George Edwards (interviewed Jan. 4)

To date, the Bears are the only team to interview Edwards, which is a little surprising given how successful his Minnesota Vikings’ defense has been in the last four seasons. The 50-year-old has extensive experience on the defensive side of the ball, and would’ve likely had to pitch Pace not only on his credentials but on what his offensive staff would look like. 

Pat Shurmur (interviewed Jan. 5)

Shurmur also interviewed with the Arizona Cardinals and New York Giants during the Vikings’ bye week. His prior coaching experience — even if it was a 9-23 record with the Cleveland Browns — and success with the Vikings’ offense this year makes him an attractive candidate who may be at or near the top of multiple teams’ wish lists. 

An interesting report to consider here: Shurmur may be interested in bringing Case Keenum — who completed 68 percent of his passes for 3,547 yards with 22 touchdowns and seven interceptions in 2017 — with him to where he winds up as a head coach. If Shurmur were to be hired by the Bears, though, Keenum wouldn’t follow him to a destination that already has a quarterback in place. 

Sticking with Keenum may not be a major factor for Shurmur, but if it is, Arizona — after the retirement of Carson Palmer — would seem to make the most sense. 

Josh McDaniels (interviewed Jan. 5)

The tension uncovered by ESPN in New England could help motivate McDaniels to jump at a head coaching opportunity this year, unless things completely blow up and Bill Belichick forces a move to the New York Giants and McDaniels is promoted to be the Patriots’ head coach. But that’s a hard-to-fathom scenario. 

More realistic is McDaniels having an opportunity to be the next head coach of the Bears, Indianapolis Colts and New York Giants — the three teams that’ve interviewed him so far. The Tennessee Titans’ comeback win over the Kansas City Chiefs saved coach Mike Mularkey’s job, and eliminated another possible destination for McDaniels

John DeFilippo (interviewed Jan. 6)

The Cardinals interviewed DeFilippo Friday night, with the Bears coming in a day later. His willingness to retain Fangio on staff would be a smart move for a 39-year-old with only one year of coordinator experience. How DeFilippo pitched Pace on his offensive structure for Mitchell Trubisky is of similar importance here. 

"A significant question when we're interviewing candidates is what is your staff going to look like, especially when you're talking to younger coaches," Pace said on New Year's Day. "But you know we have a process laid out, I feel like we have a very good plan in place, it's just a matter of executing that going forward in a pretty competitive market."

If DeFilippo nailed both of his interviews, it could leave him with this choice: Go to the team that already has a young quarterback in place, or go to Arizona and draft his own quarterback to develop. 

Matt Nagy (interviewed Jan. 7)

Nagy’s interview with the Bears came less than 24 hours after the Chiefs blew an 18-point halftime lead and were knocked out of the playoffs by the Titans. That may be a bit awkward, but it could’ve been revealing for Pace in Nagy’s explanation of what went wrong on Saturday. 

Nagy, according to our own David Kaplan, is a big fan of Trubisky:

The way Nagy used tight end Travis Kelce (83 receptions, 1,038 yards, 8 TDs) could be an intriguing part of his pitch to the Bears for the growth of second-round pick Adam Shaheen, too. 

Might Nagy — who also reportedly has an interview with the Colts set up — want to stick things out in Kansas City and gain some more play-calling experience with Patrick Mahomes as his quarterback next year? Perhaps. But if he likes Trubisky, the Bears could be a good fit for him. The question then is whether the Bears think he’s a better fit for Trubisky than McDaniels, Shurmur, DeFilippo, etc.

Others?

The Bears reportedly requested to interview Carolina Panthers defensive coordinator Steve Wilks last week, but are not among the four teams that have interviews set up with him (the Arizona Cardinals, Detroit Lions, Indianapolis Colts and New York Giants will interview him this week, according to NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport). 

If the Bears were to interview a college coach, it’s unlikely they would publicize it in the way they’ve announced these previous six interviews. But that would be a majorly under-the-radar development, given there hasn’t been any buzz about specific college coaches being linked to the Bears. Remember: Five years ago, when Notre Dame coach Brian Kelly interviewed with the Philadelphia Eagles, it quickly became public knowledge. 

Report: Bears could be a potential landing spot for Dolphins WR Jarvis Landry

jlandry.png
USA TODAY

Report: Bears could be a potential landing spot for Dolphins WR Jarvis Landry

The Bears are looking for an upgrade at wide receiver this offseason, and there may be one available.

The Dolphins used the franchise tag on wide receiver Jarvis Landry on Tuesday, in a move that many believe signals the team's desire to deal him instead of losing him in free agency for nothing.

Landry put up excellent numbers last season, catching 112 passes for 987 yards and nine touchdowns. He led the league in catches and was fourth in touchdown receptions but was just 17th in yards. His yards per reception ranked 108th of 139 qualifying players.

Still, it's no secret he'd be an upgrade for the Bears at wide receiver. Though they'll get Cam Meredith and Kevin White back from injury, the corps largely struggled and didn't give rookie quarterback Mitch Trubisky much help.

Luckily, they may be interested in Landry, per NFL.com's Ian Rapoport.

"There are a couple teams that we should keep an eye on as far as a potential Jarvis Landry landing spot......the Chicago Bears are looking for receviers," he said.

Rapoport also mentioned the Titans, Panthers and Saints as options for Landry. The franchise tag will pay Landry about $16 million before he becomes a free agent in 2019 (or has the franchise tag used on him again).

 

2017 Bears position grades: Management

2017 Bears position grades: Management

2017 grade: D+

For these purposes, “management” encompasses the coaching staff and front office. We don’t need a lengthy re-litigation of the failures of the John Fox era, so briefly: The offense was unimaginative, predictable and unsuccessful; there were too many head-scratching coaching decisions, punctuated by that backfiring challenge flag against Green Bay; the defense was solid but not spectacular; special teams had plenty of highs (three touchdowns) and lows (Marcus Cooper’s gaffe against Pittsburgh, Connor Barth’s missed field goal against Detroit). Fox didn’t win enough games to justify a fourth year, even if he left the Bears in a better place than he found them back in 2015. But that 5-11 record drags the management grade down. 

But the larger thing we’re going to focus on here is the hits and misses for Ryan Pace in the 2017 league year. The hits: 

-- Drafting Mitchell Trubisky. Will this be a long-term success? That’s another question. But Pace hitched his future in Chicago to a quarterback last April. For a franchise that hasn’t had a “franchise” quarterback in ages, what more can you ask for? If Trubisky pans out, nobody should care that Pace traded up one spot -- effectively losing a third-round pick for his conviction in his guy -- to make the move. 

-- Moving quickly to hire Matt Nagy. As with Trubisky, Pace identified his guy and made sure he got him. The Bears hired Nagy just two days after the Kansas City Chiefs’ season ended with that playoff collapse against the Tennessee Titans, and with the Indianapolis Colts -- who eventually got burned by Josh McDaniels -- sniffing around Nagy, Pace made his move to hire a young, energetic, offensive-minded coach to pair with Trubisky. It’s tough to argue with any of the coaching hires made by Nagy, who had a head start on the competition: He retained defensive coordinator Vic Fangio and that entire defensive staff, kept Dave Ragone to be Trubisky’s quarterbacks coach and hired Mark Helfrich to bring some different concepts as offensive coordinator, and hired a special teams coach in Chris Tabor who must’ve been doing something right to survive seven years and a bunch of coaching changes in Cleveland. Like with Trubisky, it’s too early to say if Nagy will or won’t work out long-term, but it stands out that Pace had conviction in getting a franchise quarterback and a head coach who will make or break his tenure in Chicago. 

-- Drafting Tarik Cohen and Eddie Jackson in the fourth round. In Cohen, the Bears found an offensive spark (who was nonetheless under-utilized) who also was a key contributor on special teams. In Jackson, the Bears added a plug-and-play 16-game starter at safety who looks to have some upside after a solid rookie year. Both picks here were a triumph for the Bears’ amateur scouting department: Cohen wasn’t on everyone’s radar (special teams coach Chris Tabor, who previously was with the Browns, said Cohen’s name never came across his desk in Cleveland), while Jackson was coming off a broken leg that prematurely ended a solid career at Alabama. These were assuredly two hits. 

-- Signing Akiem Hicks to a four-year contract extension. The Bears rewarded Hicks a day before the season began; Hicks rewarded them with a Pro Bowl-caliber season (despite him only being a fourth alternate) and was the best player on the team in 2017. 

-- Signing Charles Leno to a four-year contract extension. Leno may not be an elite tackle, and still has some things to clean up in his game, but he’s 26 and his four-year, $37 million contract is the 14th-largest among left tackles (for what it’s worth, Bleacher Report ranked Leno as the 20th best left tackle in the NFL). The Bears believe Leno is still improving, and could turn that contract into a bargain in the future. But this is important to note, too: Players notice when a team rewards one of its own, especially when that guy is a well-respected former seventh-round draft pick. 

-- Signing Mark Sanchez to a one-year deal. This wasn’t a miss, certainly, and while it’s not much of a “hit,” Sanchez was exactly what the Bears wanted: A veteran mentor to Trubisky. While Sanchez was inactive for all 16 games, he and the No. 2 overall pick struck up a good relationship that makes him a candidate to return in 2018 as a true backup. 

-- Releasing Josh Sitton when he did. Whether or not the Bears offensive line is better off in 2018 is a different question, but file cutting Sitton on Feb. 20 -- when the team had until mid-March to make a decision on him -- as one of those things that gets noticed by players around the league. 

-- Announcing the expansion to Halas Hall. The plan has Pace’s fingerprints on it, and should help make the Bears a more attractive destination to free agents in 2018 and beyond. 

And now, for the misses:

-- Signing Mike Glennon. That completely bombed out. While the Bears weren’t hurting for cap space a year ago, and Glennon’s contract essentially was a one-year prove-it deal, his play was so poor that he was benched after only four games -- when the initial plan was for him to start the entire season to give Trubisky time to develop. The wheels came off for Glennon on his seventh pass in Week 2, when after completing his first six he threw the ball right to Tampa Bay’s Kwon Alexander for an interception from which he never seemed to recover. He’ll be cut sometime soon. 

-- Signing Markus Wheaton. After signing a two-year, $11 million deal in the spring, Wheaton struggled to stay healthy, with an appendectomy and finger injury limiting him in training camp and the early part of the season, and then a groin injury knocking out a few weeks in the middle of the season. When Wheaton was healthy, he was ineffective, catching only three of his 17 targets. That places him with eight other players since 1992 who’ve been targeted at least 15 times and and caught fewer than 20 percent of their targets. He’s another one of Pace’s 2017 free agent signings who’s likely to be cut. 

-- Signing Marcus Cooper. The Bears thought they were signing an ascending player who picked off four passes in 2016 and would be a better scheme fit in Chicago than he was in Arizona. Instead, Cooper was a liability when he was on the field and didn’t live up to his three-year, $16 million contract (with $8 million guaranteed). Dropping the ball before he got in the end zone Week 3 against Pittsburgh was a lowlight. The Bears can net $4.5 million in cap savings if he’s cut, per Spotrac. 

-- Signing Dion Sims. Sims isn’t as likely to be cut as Glennon and Wheaton, and even Cooper, but his poor production in the passing game (15 catches, 29 targets, 180 yards, one touchdown) puts a spotlight on how the Bears evaluate how he was as a run blocker in 2017. If that grade was high, the Bears could justify keeping him and not garnering a little more than $5.5 million in cap savings. If it was low, and the Bears are confident in Adam Shaheen’s ability to improve, then Sims could be cut as well. 

-- Signing Quintin Demps. The loss here was mitigated by the strong play of Adrian Amos, but Demps didn’t make much of an impact on the field before his Week 3 injury besides getting plowed over by Falcons tight end Austin Hooper in Week 1. He’d be a decent guy to have back as a reserve given his veteran leadership -- he was a captain in 2017 -- but given how well Amos and Eddie Jackson worked together last year, he’s unlikely to get his starting spot back in 2018. 

-- The wide receiver position as a whole. Kendall Wright led the Bears in receptions and yards, but his numbers would’ve looked a lot better had he been surrounded by better players. The cupboard was bare at this position, and after the worst-case scenario happened -- Cameron Meredith tearing his ACL in August, and Kevin White breaking his collarbone in Week 1 -- the Bears were left with an overmatched and underperforming group of receivers. For Trubisky’s sake, Pace has to work to make sure 2018 isn’t a repeat of 2017. 

-- The kicker position as a whole. Since we’re focusing solely on Pace’s 2017 moves, the decision to release Robbie Gould and replace him with Connor Barth doesn’t fall into this grade. But Barth had struggled with consistency prior to this season, and Roberto Aguayo didn’t provide much competition in his short-lived stint in training camp. The Bears eventually released Barth after he missed a game-tying kick against Detroit in November, then replaced him with a guy in Cairo Santos who was coming off an injury and, as it turned out, wasn’t completely healthy yet. So the Bears then had to move on from Santos and sign Mike Nugent to get them through the rest of the season. Better consistency from this position will be important to find in 2018. 

A couple moves fall into the neither hits nor misses category:

-- Drafting Adam Shaheen. Tight ends rarely make a significant impact as rookies, but Shaheen was only targeted 14 times last year. He did catch three touchdowns and flash some good chemistry with Trubisky before suffering an injury against Cincinnati that wound up ending his season. The gains he makes with a year of experience under his belt and during his first full offseason as a pro will be critical in determining his success in Year 2, and whether or not taking him 45th overall was a hit or a miss. 

-- Signing Prince Amukamara. This was neither good nor bad, with Amukamara playing solidly in coverage but not making enough plays on the ball and committing a few too many penalties. 

Pace still has decisions to make on a few other potential cuts, including right tackle Bobby Massie ($5.584 million cap savings per Spotrac) and linebackers Willie Young ($4.5 million cap savings) and Pernell McPhee ($7.075 million cap savings). Whether or not to place the franchise tag on Kyle Fuller and potentially pay him $15 million in 2018 is another call Pace has to make before the official end of the 2017 league year. 

But for Pace, did the hits out-weigh the misses in 2017? The Glennon signing imploded, but Trubisky showed signs of promise during an average season for a rookie quarterback. Cooper was a bust, but Fuller emerged as a potential long-term option to cover for that. The most glaring misses, then, were at wide receiver and tight end where, after injuries sapped those units of Cameron Meredith and Zach Miller, there weren’t reliable targets for Trubisky. 

We’ll probably need more time to determine if Pace’s “hits” on Trubisky and Nagy truly are “hits.” But if they are, the misses of 2017 -- Glennon, Wheaton, Cooper, etc. -- will be nothing more than amusing footnotes to a successful era of Bears football.