The Rockets are trying to clear cap space in order to pursue Dwight Howard, and he reportedly views that favorably.
It’s one of the subtle ways teams are allowed to communicate, indirectly obviously, with free agents before July 1. Of course, teams can use impermissible methods, too.
But there’s also another way Houston is getting its message to Howard: Chandler Parsons.
Jonathan Feigen of the Houston Chronicle:
Is this tampering? According to Larry Coon’s definition, it sure sounds like it:
The most famous recent case of a player being accused of tampering is when Dwyane Wade said he planned to talk to LeBron James, Chris Bosh and Joe Johnson before free agency began in 2010. At the time, the NBA ruled that wasn’t tampering, as explained by NBA Vice President Tim Frank:
Here’s how the Wade-LeBron-Bosh-Johnson meeting was described at the time by Fred Mitchell of the Chicago Tribune:
Perhaps Wade used that meeting to pitch Miami to those other stars, but there’s no public evidence he did that. It sounds like it could have just been a meeting of the minds, a forum to discuss the complex factors they were weighing in their shared situation.
This Parsons case is different. He’s obviously stumping on behalf of a specific team.
Is it different enough to warrant a fine? I have no idea.
This all gets back to the point I’ve already repeated here many times: Tampering rules are vague and arbitrarily enforced. If the NBA wants to punish Parsons or the Rockets, it will. If the league doesn’t, it won’t.
Trying to identify a consistent standard is futile, because one doesn’t exist.