The Cavaliers reportedly would’ve traded for Paul George if LeBron James committed long-term in 2018. Perhaps already planning to leave, LeBron didn’t commit then actually left for the Lakers the next year.
Now, Los Angeles is facing a similar predicament.
LeBron will be eligible for a contract extension Aug. 4. Don’t expect an early decision.
Eric Pincus of Bleacher Report:
Pincus’ sources might just be speculating based on LeBron’s history with Cleveland. That wouldn’t mean much. LeBron signed a long-term deal in Los Angeles then signed a contract extension as soon as he could, even forgoing a player option. He has operated significantly differently with the Lakers than with the Cavs.
But it’s also possible the Lakers – or even LeBron’s camp – have shared word of his plan that’s trickling through other teams. That possibility than makes this report intriguing.
It’d be easier for the Lakers to trade for a good player in a contract year, take unwanted multi-year salary and/or deal future draft picks if knowing LeBron is staying. Los Angeles doesn’t want to get caught with a miserable long-term outlook if LeBron leaves. Better to ride out the final year of Russell Westbrook’s contract then make a clean break next year.
Unlike the Cavaliers, the Lakers aren’t necessarily totally screwed if LeBron leaves. Anthony Davis is locked in through 2024. Los Angeles remains a premier market that can attract top talent.
Still, the Lakers could win a championship next year with LeBron. Even if he leaves next summer, Los Angeles can accomplish plenty before then. Plus, winning a title would probably make LeBron more likely to stay.
Though it’d be helpful to have clarity, the Lakers should mostly operate under the assumption LeBron will re-up then just hope for the best.