Chicago owner says Ovechkin should have season-long suspension
Just when you thought we had all moved on from the last illegal hit a player was suspended for, someone weighs in a brings it all right back out in the open again.
Rocky Wirtz, Chicago Blackhawks owner, feels that Ovechkin should have been suspended for the remainder of the season. Via Ed Sherman of Crain’s Chicago Business:
“Thank God it’s only the end of the season for Brian Campbell, not the end of his career. These head hits are cumulative. When you get a concussion like that, and get them over a period of time, it could end your career. That’s not what you want to see. You want to see these players on the ice. You don’t want to see them in the press box.”
“If you’re really going to hurt a player, knee to knee, make a head hit, and you’re out for the season, then let them suspend that player for the rest of the season. I’ll tell you, you wouldn’t see those knee-to-knee and head hits anymore.”
All hits should be punished the same, regardless of injury. That’s not the way it works, however; Ovechkin would never have been suspended if Campbell had not been injured. But if the exact same hit resulted in just a bruised shoulder for Campbell, would it make the hit any less dangerous or illegal?
One other thing: Wirtz is using the Ovechkin hit to get in on the discussion of head shots and knee on knee hits, and that is completely unfair to Ovechkin and this particular incident. I thought he ‘push’ of Campbell was reckless, but far from malicious and far from being on the same level as a blind-sided shot to the head.
You can’t just lump them all together. Ovechkin’s hit was worthy of a two-game suspension. Matt Cooke’s was worthy of a 20-game suspension. The fact that they weren’t punished at those levels is the NHL’s problem, and just now they decide to do something about it.
But making every suspension the same length as the injury? Not needed, not going to happen.