Skip navigation
Favorites
Sign up to follow your favorites on all your devices.
Sign up
Odds by

Baseball executives don’t like Max Scherzer’s deferred money deal

Press conference for newly acquired pitcher Max Scherzer

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY, 21: Max Scherzer, newly acquired pitcher for the Washington Nationals, talks with the media during his introductory press conference with agent Scott Boras on January 21, 2015 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Jonathan Newton / The Washington Post via Getty Images)

The Washington Post/Getty Images

Buster tweets:

There is anger among the teams that Major League Baseball permitted Max Scherzer’s deal to have such a high percentage of deferred money.

— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) February 10, 2015

The contract is for seven-years and $210 million. But as Buster notes, a huge amount of deferred money in involved. It stretches over the next 14 years and includes a $50 million signing bonus. For luxury tax purposes the contract is considered to be a $191.4 million deal based on present value, with an annual salary for such purposes determined to be $28.69 million.

Why this bugs other teams is a mystery. In response to other folks on Twitter, Olney cites executives displeasure with the $210 million figure now being the standard for an elite pitcher. I presume they also now worry that the expectation from agents will be that future deals for other pitchers include all of that deferred dough.

Which seems kind of unimportant. A $191 million deal or a $210 deal? Eh. With those kinds of numbers we’re starting to approach rounding error, even if the rounding involves eight figures.

Mostly, I think, this is a case of baseball executives not liking that someone got a huge free agent salary. Which they have always hated. At least in every case where it’s not their own team handing out the money.