Skip navigation
Sign up to follow your favorites on all your devices.
Sign up

Report: Cavaliers won’t match Matthew Dellavedova’s offer sheet from Bucks

Milwaukee Bucks v Cleveland Cavaliers

CLEVELAND, OH - DECEMBER 31: Matthew Dellavedova #8 of the Cleveland Cavaliers looks for a pass while under pressure from Khris Middleton #22 and Zaza Pachulia #27 of the Milwaukee Bucks during the second half at Quicken Loans Arena on December 31, 2014 in Cleveland, Ohio. The Bucks defeated the Cavaliers 96-80. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Matthew Dellavedova will reportedly sign a four-year, $38 million offer sheet with the Bucks.

Will the Cavaliers match?

LeBron James:

Is that as definitive as it looks?

Chris Haynes of

The Cleveland Cavaliers will not match the offer sheet restricted free agent guard Matthew Dellavedova received from the Milwaukee Bucks, league sources informed

The Cavs should probably match, though it’s not my money. But given the luxury-tax payments Dan Gilbert has already made, why stop now?

Dellavedova is a good backup guard, and he might start for the Bucks. They could use him next to quasi-point guard Giannis Antetokounmpo.

Paying a starter $9.5 million would be great value for Milwaukee, but that’s not a bad price for a backup point guard in this market (though, again, the resulting luxury-tax payments in Cleveland would complicate matters).

The Cavaliers have Mo Williams and No. 54 pick Kay Felder, whom I rated as a first-rounder. Williams played well early last season before falling off. If the 33-year-old re-finds his footing, he’d be fine and could give Felder time to find his footing.

Still, neither option looks as good as Dellavedova. Neither does anyone Cleveland could get with the mid-level exception.

Far above the cap anyway, the Cavs’ only cost to matching would be real dollars -- not roster flexibility. Apparently, that cost is too high.