Skip navigation
Favorites
Sign up to follow your favorites on all your devices.
Sign up
Odds by

Marlins won’t give Albert Pujols a no-trade clause

St Louis Cardinals v Philadelphia Phillies - Game 1

PHILADELPHIA, PA - OCTOBER 01: Albert Pujols #5 of the St. Louis Cardinals runs to first on a ground out in the sixth inning of Game One of the National League Division Series against the Philadelphia Phillies at Citizens Bank Park on October 1, 2011 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Drew Hallowell/Getty Images)

Getty Images

UPDATE: Marlins president David Samson said this afternoon that “there will not be a free agent signed that includes a no-trade clause.” So if that’s truly a sticking point for Pujols, it would be a deal-breaker.
==========

Ken Rosenthal of FOXSports.com confirms previous reports that the Marlins have offered Albert Pujols a 10-year contract and adds that the two sides are meeting again to address Pujols’ demand for a no-trade clause.

When the Marlins signed Jose Reyes much was made about their refusal to give any player a no-trade clause, but not surprisingly Pujols wanting the right to veto a move could be enough to change their stance.

According to Rosenthal he wants no-trade rights for the first five seasons of the 10-year deal, at which point his 10-and-5 rights with the Marlins would kick in and give Pujols the ability to block moves anyway. In other words, a no-trade clause for the first five seasons would essentially be a no-trade clause for the entire 10-year contract.