Skip navigation
Favorites
Sign up to follow your favorites on all your devices.
Sign up

Why trading Kyle Orton makes no sense

Denver Broncos v Philadelphia Eagles

PHILADELPHIA - DECEMBER 27: Quarterback Kyle Orton #8 of the Denver Broncos throws a pass during a game against the Philadelphia Eagles on December 27, 2009 at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Eagles won 30-27.(Photo by Hunter Martin/Getty Images)

Hunter Martin

Kyle Orton’s career year (3,800 yards, 62% completions, 21:12 TD: INT, 7 YPA) didn’t win him a lot of respect in Denver’s front office based on the Broncos’ offseason moves.

The lack of appreciation is now extending into the media.

A sample from Sunday’s Denver Post:

Mike Kizla says Orton would have “rocks for brains” to start another game for the Broncos, and should quietly request a trade.

“Why should Orton stick around and be a clown in the Tim Tebow circus?” Kizla asks.

Woody Paige says the team needs to deal the “Deberg-like” Orton. He is apparently “not a true leader. . . . Orton’s soft attitude didn’t motivate his teammates. . . . Orton is not a short-term fix or a long-range fit for the Broncos.”

We don’t agree with either position. Orton’s best chance for a big contract elsewhere would be to perform well under McDaniels in Denver. He has the inside track on a starting job to open the season. He’d be crazy to want to leave now to be a backup elsewhere.

Trading Orton sounds good for Denver, but who is giving up anything for him at this point? We can’t imagine a team that would invest in Orton. We’d argue that keeping Orton around for another year and retaining his rights is more valuable than some sixth-round pick.

Finally, Orton knows McDaniels’ system well and he’s the best quarterback on the roster.

Here’s a scary notion for Denver: he might still be the best quarterback in two years.