It right now is impossible to compare Michael Jordan and LeBron James right now.
Not simply because Jordan has set the bar ridiculously high — using arguably the best player ever and his six rings as a measuring stick is not fair because even other all-time greats fall short of that mark — but also because we don’t know LeBron’s legacy yet. There are no shortage of commenters on this site who seem to miss my overall point about LeBron:
We can’t define his legacy yet, he’s 27 and just entering the prime of his career. He’s the best player in the game today, what we will think of him a decade from now is impossible to say.
But, LeBron vs. Jordan has become a thing. And even Phil Jackson got sucked into it during his discussion on ESPN radio in in Chicago recently (via Sports Radio Interviews). Here is what Jackson said about LeBron.
Or, to put it another way, we don’t know what LeBron’s legacy will be. Could he steamroll five more rings in the next six or seven years? How will that change how we perceive him in a decade? One ring already changed that for a lot of people.
Jackson is right, LeBron entered the NBA pompous and not mentally ready to really win or improve his game to the point he could quickly. (Considering he was one the cover of Sports Illustrated at 15 with them calling him the chosen one, combined with his family situation, I’m not sure what other outcome anyone could expect.)
But right now he has mentally matured, and that could allow him to start to use all those physical gifts in the best way to lead a team to rings. Could. We will see.
And maybe we should wait until LeBron is through is prime before we try to cement his legacy.