Steve Kerr claims that money wasn’t the motivating factor in his departure
Steve Kerr’s departure from the Suns was a bit curious...until Yahoo’s Adrian Wojnarowski chimed in with the punchline: Robert Sarver asked Kerr to take a 10% paycut. Typical Sarver, typical Suns.
There’s just one catch: publicly, both Saver and Kerr deny that the money played a significant part in Kerr and the Suns’ divorce. From Paul Coro of the Arizona Republic:
Kerr and Suns Managing Partner Robert Sarver negotiated through Monday. Kerr was offered a one-year contract to stay at his current salary or a three-year deal that would repeat his previous one except for adding a third-year bonus. That meant Kerr’s first-year salary would be a cut of about 10 percent from last season, when his salary ranked in the upper one-third of West GMs.
“It (money) was a small part of it,” Sarver said. “I’m not sure it was a part of it at all.”
It was part of a picture that made leaving a better option. Kerr was not expecting a raise, considering the club’s annual losses and $2.5 million still owed to Terry Porter, a coach he hired and fired. But negotiations came at the same time that TNT’s lead-analyst job was vacated by Doug Collins, who became Philadelphia’s coach.
Kerr, 44, has commuted from his San Diego home to work in Phoenix, travel with the team and scout nationally. He said his wife, Margot, and children (ages 12, 15 and 17) were a “big, big reason” for his choice.
“This is not a contract issue,” Kerr said at a news conference that Sarver did not attend Tuesday due to a prior commitment. “This is a career and personal decision that I’ve made.”