By the time Knicks James Dolan owner fired Phil Jackson as team president in 2017, it was apparent Jackson would fail even further if he stayed on the job.
Jackson was making a mess of the Carmelo Anthony situation. Jackson was alienating Kristaps Porzingis. While New York went 17-65, 32-50, and 31-51 in his three full seasons in charge, Jackson instilled no confidence he could assemble a quality roster.
But when asked about what went wrong during his Knicks tenure, Jackson first cited the media. Then, he said the problem worsened by the end.
Jackson on “The Curious Leader” podcast (hosted by his former player Coby Karl):
I don’t recall a single instance of someone calling Jackson’s Carmelo Anthony-spots-on-a-leopard comment racist. It definitely wasn’t roundly made into a racist remark.
What was deemed racially insensitive: Jackson using the word “posse” to describe LeBron James’ friends and business partners.
The spots-on-a-leopard incident drew criticism because it was yet another example of Jackson disparaging Anthony. Though Jackson’s assessments of Anthony weren’t completely off base, this was not a healthy way for a lead executive to handle his star player. If nothing else, Jackson was sabotaging Anthony’s trade value.
The media did report plenty of unflattering stories about Jackson using anonymous sources. Jackson was reportedly unreachable approaching a trade deadline. Jackson reportedly fell asleep during a draft prospect’s workout. Jackson reportedly couldn’t get his computer to work during a free agent pitch. Jackson reportedly floored multiple free agents with his unpreparedness in meetings.
Were all those stories true? I can’t say with certainty.
That’s where Jackson’s comparison to former president Donald Trump comes in. The media reported many unflattering things about Trump. Many times, the stories were true. Sometimes, they were not.
It’s unacceptable for reporters to spread misinformation. If those reports about Jackson were inaccurate, that’s unfair.
Also true: That the reports were believable was problematic on its own. That wouldn’t be the case with a competent executive.